Wednesday, July 16, 2025

The Facebook Mansfield Connection Censored Entry

 I've been doing some free (as in free beer) analysis and troubleshooting work locally because the Community Center I attend in Mansfield, CT is trying to pull a fast one (as in fraudulent scam) involving Senior Citizen insurance benefits.

The Mansfield Community Center has created a political narrative that removes Tivity Health based reimbursement incentives (Silver Sneakers, et al) from being used to access the facility offerings.

The politicians claim the facility is being short-changed. I attended the public meeting. Mansfield's Facebook page is where the issue is being discussed and my remark was censored. This is the exchange of interest.

"
I attended the Mansfield Silver sneakers public hearing and will provide some information that should open some eyes.


The first speaker noted that the Board claimed that the Silver Sneakers reimbursement claim was incorrect. I looked up his assertion in Google AI.

Mansfield Parks and Rec claims that "For every dollar received for a traditional MCC membership the insurance providers reimburse an average just 42 cents. Unfortunately, the revenues received from insurance carriers to provide these services are not adequately offsetting the costs." This is not only a fraudulent claim but it is equally disingenuous in its attempt to gaslight the public.

An individual MCC membership fee is $39.00/mo. $39 x .42 = $16.38/mo reimbursement. The problem is that that's not how reimbursement works.

Google AI: "The reimbursement that a community center or gym receives from Tivity Health, the parent company of Silver Sneakers, is typically on a 
per-visit basis.[1] This means the facility is paid each time a Silver Sneakers member checks in.

All reactions:

14

14

Like

Comment

Send

Most relevant



Steven Knauf

What I find interesting is that a for profit business seems to think it is profitable enough to continue but that a government department does not think this is so. This is rather unique in my experience. Perhaps we should compare how each is applying this to see if any modifications should be made to make the program more profitable.

Also, will there be a review of policies if the projected income does not materialize and/or if there is a drop in membership from people 65 and older.

Last thing....is every program at the center run at a profit?

  • 1h

  • Like

  • Reply



Frank Krasicki

Steven Knauf Google AI: "Understanding the project involves grasping its purpose, scope, and the processes involved in its execution and completion. This includes defining clear goals, understanding the project's lifecycle, and identifying key components like scope, time, cost, and quality. A project is a temporary endeavor with a defined beginning and end, aiming to create a unique product, service, or result."

IMO (and I don't think I'm wrong) when government dedicates itself to a long term public works project, say a Community Center, it is performing a civic entanglement, much like marriage, "for better or for worse". In other words, this isn't about initial cost but about long term civic upside - not always fiscal.

This Mansfield government doesn't understand the project. The MCC is a maintenance challenge. It requires a thoughtful maintenance schedule that softens that cost. Mansfield's P&R budget spending resurfaced the gym floor, bought lots of new equipment, added an outdoor pickleball court, added a new massive playground, on and on and on. It exploded the public works budget and played accounting tricks with lots of loosey-goosey cost centers. And, as an inevitable consequence, has saddled future generations of tax-payers with the continuing maintenance and upkeep cost.

So it comes as no surprise, that they're phishing for money and the seniors are an easy (but pyrrhic) cash cow to cover their spending addiction.

When I queried Google Ai about Mansfield's budget, it suggested that Mansfield has added a lot of new employees lately. It's that sucking sound you hear around town.

  • 41m

  • Like

  • Reply





Steven Knauf

I don't believe the seniors are an easy cash cow. I agree with you it is pyrrhic at best. I think it sends a bad message but time will tell."

No comments: