I was reading a Rick Green's Courant blog about the Avon school budget called, Avon Parents Support Public Schools -- and Higher Taxes.
Intriguing. And there in the comments section I found a cliche that is like that paper cut.
In any event, the median property tax burden for those in single family houses in Avon is 5.56%. That is 70th highest of CT's 169 towns for FY 2008-09 tax payments. Their median state income tax burden rank is 11th highest of CT's towns.
This is the fuzzy math of the education entitlement funding myth. In other words, someone out there is gaming the economic statistics to imply that any of our communities are obligated to tax a certain percentage of income for public education whether it needs it or not.
And worse still, tax whether the town can afford it or not.
In Region 19, we have such a pattern of tax abuse. Because towns pay per student ratios of the regional school budgets, there are always towns paying more or less than the other. And the game is that no town should ever pay less than the year before. For example, this year, an EO Smith budget that desperately needs pruning isn't getting it. The magic reason? Mansfield already has reached a zero increase in EO Smith funding.
Heaven forbid that the finance committee actually consider what is best for all three towns regardless of such nonsense.
But all across Connecticut, taxpayers are being bludgeoned by a tax engine that works just this one way - always spend more and more and more.
You've been conditioned to believe that's better for kids.
That's not always the case.
More on the Black Ops soon (still fact finding).